|
| Recent
Articles |
Time Warner, Others To Pay $23M Settlement
Accusations of fraud and improper accounting practices at AOL led to lawsuits against Time Warner in 2004 because of their effect on pension and investment funds in Pennsylvania.
Feds Infighting Over College Wiretapping
US Senator Lamar Alexander and his ex-staffer Deborah Taylor Tate now occupy opposing positions on the issue of colleges funding network upgrades that will make them compliant with federal wiretapping needs.
Net Neutrality Amendment Shot Down
Telecommunications giants scored a victory over
Net Neutrality advocates in the U.S. legislature
yesterday...
No More AOL Free Hours
Heh. When America Online made the strange move of renaming themselves to an ancronym that no longer stands for anything (AOL LLC) and made dial-up and broadband cost the same...
Google, EarthLink Win S.F. WiFi Deal
The City of San Francisco finished its review of
proposals to create a city-wide wireless broadband
network, and chose the EarthLink/Google submission...
FCC
Sucks, Says Google Lawyer
The war of words between major content providers
and the telecom companies escalated nicely during
the opening of the VON conference in San Jose...
|
|
|
|
06.02.06
AOL Employees Don't Use AOL Search
 By
Jason Lee Miller
AOL has been consistently 4th place in terms of search share, and Jason Calacanis thinks he knows why - because AOL sucks to search with. Calacanis, who joined AOL after the company bought his blog network, Weblogs Inc., slammed his parent company's woeful search presentation on his weblog.
In response to criticism that he was too glowing about AOL's products, Calacanis decided to up his street cred by pointing out where the company could improve.
"The way I look at it, the first step to sucking less is knowing you suck," he commented on Jim Kukral's ReveNews blog.
Besides AIM Triton's sluggishness, Calacanis believes that AOL should work on its "screen real estate," noting that to get to the Google-powered organic search results, the user has to scroll past an onslaught of promotional and sponsored links. The organic listings are nearly off the page.
The search result presentation is so "very, very bad," according to Calacanis, that even AOL employees don't use AOL search.
When I ask folks inside our company what search engine they use they say "Google." I ask them why, the most common response is "because it's cleaner." Sometime folks says it's faster, but I don't think that's the case or the reason. We basically all know that our search is filled with too many ads and too much collateral, yet we haven't done anything about it for months.
Calacanis goes on with a screenshot comparison of search results from Google, MSN, Yahoo! and AOL. The comparison shows that AOL organic results are over twice as far (300 pixels farther) down the page than Google's results.
First, we are pushing the search results over 198 pixels to the right so we can have a navigation box that no one really uses. Then we have our "Snapshot" module which features links to iTunes, Apple, a canned news search, and a link to our shopping section--not much value there. Next up is Sponsored Links, and we're running three to Google's two. After all that--538 pixels down the page--you get the first organic result.
Calacanis concludes that AOL's 4th place position is due to the engine's "less generous" use of search real estate.
About the Author:
Jason L. Miller is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.
|
